Paparazzi: Public Curiosity or Invasion of Privacy?

In recent months, I have been approached frequently by the media for insights on the practices of paparazzi, particularly regarding the extremes they’ll go to for that elusive “perfect shot.” Having spent over 20 years providing Celebrity and Executive Risk Management Services globally, it is clear that while every client’s profile and public image may vary, one constant remains: the relentless nature of paparazzi. No matter the location, these photographers will go to extraordinary lengths to capture that “million-dollar” photo.

When asked how far paparazzi will go, I’ve witnessed them engaging in behavior that crosses ethical lines. From hiding in neighbors’ driveways and posing as renters to gain visual access, to using drones to fly over private backyards, even sifting through a client’s trash for personal information. In multiple cities—Toronto, New York, LA, Hong Kong—I’ve experienced paparazzi chasing vehicles at high speeds, showing little regard for traffic laws or public safety, all in pursuit of a single photo.

During a recent interview, I posed a thought-provoking question to a reporter: “Can you tell me the difference between a stalker and a paparazzo?” The answer is simple: “a camera.” While laws are in place to protect individuals, executives, and celebrities from obsessive stalkers, offering legal recourse through restraining orders and, in some cases, imprisonment, paparazzi often go to even greater lengths without consequence. The psychological toll on clients can be severe, leaving them fearful of leaving their homes, dining out, or even traveling, constantly concerned about being followed or harass.